ABSTRACTS NOW OPEN THROUGH JUNE 30
- Legislation and Policy: Child Protection and Child Rights
- Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect: Risks and Protective Factors
- Domestic Violence and Children
- Sexual Abuse & Exploitation
- Outcome of Child Protection Services: Best Practices and the Role of the Community and Children
- Multi-Disciplinary Teams: Best Practices and Challenges
- Epidemiological Data and Research
- Special Topics
The abstract submission deadline is June 30, 2019.
Authors will be notified starting JUNE 15 on a rolling review, and will be required to register by JULY 30 to hold your spot and be eligible for the author /early bird discount. Please note these dates and be on alert.
1. Abstracts should not exceed 300 words. You can return to the system to edit until you “Submit”.
2. Required elements:
- Bullets of 3-4 recommendations or takeaway points for the audience.
3. Abstracts are to be submitted and presented in English. Abstracts and presentations in Arabic are to be submitted to an alternate abstract submission website. Please see www.ispcan.org for more information.
4. When submitting your abstract, please select one Corresponding Author whom will assume responsibility for receiving and responding promptly to all email messages. The Corresponding Author is responsible for forwarding information to all the other authors listed on the abstract.
5. All Presenting Authors are required to submit all presentation materials to the Congress no later than 1 week prior to the Congress. NO EXCEPTIONS.
6. All accepted abstracts requires a minimum of one author (the “Presenting Author”) to complete registration and provide payment in full by the published deadline in order to confirm inclusion in the Congress program.
7. Symposium must have a minimum of 4 separate Presenting Authors on site and registered.
Authors indicate their preferred presentation format. Based on scores, the Scientific Committee will make the final determination regarding the presentation format of accepted abstracts.
A display area will be provided. It is expected that the author will be present at the poster location during the specified presentation time(s) to discuss the contents with the conference participants. Further instructions will be provided in the abstract acceptance letter. Top 3 posters will be awarded at the end of the Congress.
Oral Presentation (15 minutes)
The time allocated for each oral presentation is 15 minutes, with 5 minutes reserved for each author in the session for audience discussion and questions.
Workshop (45 minutes)
A workshop is a session involving interactive learning and the building of new skills. Abstracts intended for workshops should include skill based learning objectives and describe how interactive learning will be incorporated.
Multimedia Presentation (45 minutes)
The author provides an overview of the multimedia presentation, and theme to be discussed by the session participants and facilitates the discussion all during a one hour session. The overview and theme for discussion are required in the abstract submission.
Symposium (90 minutes)
A symposium is a topical presentation with 4-5 papers that address a common theme. Each symposia require a minimum attendance of 4 Presenting Authors, whom must register and pay in full to be included in the Congress program.
Each symposium also requires a Corresponding Author to act as session chair/convener and who is responsible for identifying the presenting authors to the symposium, ensuring the appropriate abstracts are submitted by those authors and that the 4 Presenting Authors register, pay in full and attend the conference.
The Corresponding Author is required to provide an overview abstract for the symposium and submit the individual abstracts for the other contributors. Individual abstracts should be submitted with the title of the symposium listed first, a dash (-), and then the title of the individual paper (For Example: Protecting Children in our Communities – Results from a Japanese Rural Village where ‘Protecting Children in our Communities’ is the title of the Symposium and ‘Results from a Japanese Rural Village’ is the title of the abstract/paper). Is this submitted all by one person with 4 attachments?
In order to ensure the highest scientific standards, ISPCAN employs a double blind review of all abstracts. A double blind review utilizes two different reviewers to independently score each abstract without access to the author’s name, country or any other details. Abstracts are scored on four categories:
- Technical merit
- Data supported methodology
- Innovation or advancement in the field of Child Abuse and Neglect Prevention
- Three key learning objectives and/or practical implications For workshops submissions, please describe interactive learning activities.
Scores are averaged for all four categories which are then weighted equally. Abstracts are selected based on their final score.